In my opinion railways should make future train sets with this coach composition 6 general class coaches including luggage loading capacity , 6 sleeper coaches , 8 ac class coaches ( which can include third ac or second ac or first ac or can be a mixture of these coaches ) and ( either 1 ac coach or 2 ac coaches can be removed to add pantry car coach and extra luggage coach ) so 6+6+8 total 20 and 2 electric locos ( 1 at front side of whole trainset and 1 at back side of the whole trainset ) so 20 +2 total 22 coaches , so that instead of giving lhb rakes to some trains which runs on a longer path railways should directly convert those mail or express or superfast express trains into these trains sets and cost of making lhb coaches will also be reduced or...
more... saved due to directly conversion of mail or express train into train sets and rake reversal time of many trains will be reduced cost of doing rake reversal of a train will also be reduced ( due to 2 engine 1 at back side of the trainset and 1 and front side of the train set ) and speed of all trains can be increased (due to 2 engine 1 at back side of the trainset and 1 and front side of the train set ) . Please give your opinion on this but please don't give any argument related to politics so that i can save my post from getting archived.
Or either railways can apply this coach composition in in some upcoming amrit bharat express trains so that we can get see that whether this coach composition for train sets will become a successful idea or will become waste idea.
please wait...Translate to EnglishYo, in my view, railways gotta start making these sick train sets with 6 regular coaches for all our loads, 6 cozy sleeper coaches, and 8 AC coaches where they can mix third AC, second AC, or even first AC. If we ditch 1 or 2 AC coaches, we can add a pantry car and an extra luggage coach. So, we're looking at a total of 20 coaches. Throw in 2 electric locos, one at the front and one at the back, bam, we got ourselves a 22-coach setup. Instead of messing with LHB rakes on longer routes, why not just transform existing mail or express trains into these setups? It'll save on LHB coach costs, cut down on time to reverse rakes, and even boost train speeds with dual engines. What’s your two cents on this? Let’s leave the political drama aside so my post stays clear. Alternatively, Indian Railways could trial this setup on upcoming Amrit Bharat Express trains to see if it's a hit or a miss.
please wait...Translate to HindiIn my opinion railways ko future train sets banane chahiye is coach composition ke saath - 6 general class coaches jisme luggage loading capacity bhi ho, 6 sleeper coaches, 8 AC class coaches (jisme third AC, second AC, ya first AC ho ya fir inme se koi mila kar ho) aur (ya toh 1 AC coach ya 2 AC coaches hata kar pantry car coach aur extra luggage coach add karne ke liye) toh total 6+6+8 yani 20 coaches honge. Aur fir 2 electric locos (1 train ke front side pe aur 1 train ke back side pe). Toh 20+2 yani total 22 coaches, taaki kuch trains ko jo lambi raah pe chalti hai unhe LHB rakes dena band karke direct mail ya express trains ko in train sets mein convert kiya ja sake aur LHB coaches banana ka cost bachaya ja sake. Aur bahut saari trains ke rake reversal time bhi kam ho jayega aur rake reversal karne ka cost bhi reduce hoga (kyuki do engine honge, ek train ke back side pe aur ek front side pe). Aur sabhi trains ki speed bhi badh jayegi (kyuki do engine honge, ek train ke back side pe aur ek front side pe). Apna suggestion do is baare mein lekin please politics pe argument nahi dena taki mera post archive hone se bach sake. Ya phir railways upcoming Amrit Bharat Express trains mein yeh coach composition apply kar sakti hai taki dekh sake ki yeh train sets ka idea successful hoga ya waste.