First of all congratulations to all CR members for the New Year gift that they have received .
But there are few points :-
Point - 1
If TT of 22109/22110 has to be followed than what is need for Push/Pull trials and 120 MPS in IGP-ET section , when AC SF is already covering this section successfully at MPS of 110.Hence,proved that trials...
more... and 120 MPS in IGP - ET section is currently of no use.
Point - 2
But can anybody tell what was the reason for changing the running day of CSMT - JBP GR ?
As already slot selected for CSMT RAJ is slow and is copy/paste of LTT-NZM AC which overtakes Jabalpur GR in every run.Even JBP GR has a lot of slack in BSL-KNW section and can cover delay upto 1.5 hrs in that section.So why there is a change in the running day of GR ..
Point - 3
Secunderabad Rajdhani and Chennai Garibrath are two legends who have faced the damage by slowing down by 5 mins ( they are now not running at Rajdhani slot or either duronto slot from BPL/HBJ).
When it was final that NZM arrival had to be after 10:00 Am at NZM then instead of changing timings of Secunderabad Rajdhani and Chennai Garibrath and instead of making a new slot it would have been better if CSMT RAJ have followed slot of Chennai/Secunderabad Duronto from HBJ..by following this duronto slot..Chennai garibrath and secunderabad Rajdhani could have been saved from slowing down for this CR RAJ.
I don't know why CR decided to make new slot at NZM by making the train arrive at 10:20 and making situation complicated by slowing down chennai GR and SC RAJ.Instead they could have simply followed the Duronto slot from HBJ...already they have made a slow TT.