I came after long time and I am seeing only fights on occupancy and that particular route deserving status. I also saw posts on where ICE is must there came VB - Do we even have Non-AC / ACCC being manufactured to - Answer could be too less for these and more for SL, CC VB's AB's RR's etc. IR or RB aren't concerned about these posts either. I'm wondering if there is any rule stating that trains must only run if there is 100% occupancy? or if they are half empty they're supposed to be stopped? Because we have VB's now and Shatabdi's must go off? Tomorrow we will get Sleeper VB's so does that mean that Rajdhani's must also go off? Whoever wants to travel they will. Also, there were days when same Shatabdi's were running in WL. Not just this when whole IR only...
more... had 2 VB's initially all these premium ones were full. Just the thing is that people are excited about new pattern of trainsets + so much of media publicity is being promoted and the enthusiasm can last longer. We aren't the auditors of Indian Railway to decide which train or service has to run or to stop and in near future we all will surely see dozens of these services and in late future what's meant to stay will and what's not will phase out.